Quick dating
Custom Menu
  • girls dating men
  • Sex chat free to stranger
  • Free sex chats for mobile
  • NEWS
    I was becoming attractive, to the point where other guys were staring and had lust in their eyes. “Rare exceptions will be made on the grounds of wealth,” Hodge added. And unlike some less reputable dating website we will sell, share or pass on any of your profile information to third-parties. Using Real Sex Contacts means you can remain completely anonymous.


    Radioactive dating flaws

    The following material has been taken from a sheet entitled Several Faulty Assumptions Are Used in all Radiometric Dating Methods.Carbon 14 is used for this example:, which was put out by Dr. is presently only 1/3 of the way to an equilibrium value which will be reached in 30,000 years. Knowing how faulty creationist "facts" can be, let's do a little research of our own. Any age calculated is based on multiple unprovable assumptions to match the long-age worldview.Kevin Rogers submitted a comment to that article (reproduced below, edited to focus on substantive issues), to which Dr Jim Mason replies.This argument was popularized by Henry Morris (1974, p.164), who used some calculations done in 1968 by Melvin Cook to get the 10,000-year figure. Whitelaw, using a greater ratio of carbon-14 production to decay, concluded that only 5000 years passed since carbon-14 started forming in the atmosphere!The argument may be compared to filling a barrel which has numerous small holes in its sides.The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead. They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again.This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.

    We previously reported an event organized by the Adelaide, Australia, Chapter of Reasonable Faith where Dr Justin Payne, a lecturer within the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Adelaide, sought to ‘disprove’ objections to long-age radiometric dating.Radioactive elements, such as rubidium-87 (but not strontium-86 or strontium-87), decay over time.By evaluating the concentrations of all of these isotopes in a rock sample, scientists can determine what its original make-up of strontium and rubidium were.So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.

    Leave a Reply


    Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 | Next | Last


    




    Copyright © 2017 - mitsbar.url-go.ru